“The blizzard of the world has crossed the threshold and overturned the order of the soul.” —Cohen

the personal self may be tricked into surrendering. But the governing power is not the warrior’s. it always gets its way and the warrior, provided he hang in there long enough, invariably attains freedom.

there are various ways in which the formation of paradigms—belief systems—can be manipulated to keep us within
our coop, our lunar-terrestrial matrix

there is also the fool’s option, to defy the Rule. This is the way of the old seers (and presumably some new ones), by which they opted neither to persist in the warrior’s way, nor to return to the ranks of ordinary . Instead, they chose to forge their own path against the current, attempting to “turn the abyss inside out”
show.im lolookin at it and it will change. i love it - god? - when u speak about the future

note!In game theory, Nash equilibrium (named after John Forbes Nash, who proposed it) is a solution concept of a game involving two or more players, in which each player is assumed to know the equilibrium strategies of the other players, and no player has anything to gain by changing only his or her own strategy unilaterally. If each player has chosen a strategy and no player can benefit by changing his or her strategy while the other players keep theirs unchanged, then the current set of strategy choices and the corresponding payoffs constitute a Nash equilibrium.