tiistai 28. syyskuuta 2010

Sovereignty is a highly controversial concept in political science and social theories, offering a full array of issues to be analysed. In recent

the the detailed history of the future, Aeschylus' The Egyptians, the exact number of times that the waters of the Ganges have reflected the flight of a falcon, the secret and true nature of Rome, the encyclopedia Novalis would have constructed, my dreams and half-dreams at dawn on August 14, 1994, the proof of Pierre Fermat's theorem, the unwritten chapters of Edwin Drood, those same chapters translated into the language spoken by the Garamantes, the paradoxes Berkeley invented concerning Time but didn't publish, Urizen's books of iron, the premature epiphanies of Stephen Dedalus, which would be meaningless before a cycle of a thousand years, the Gnostic Gospel of Basilides, the song the sirens sang, the complete catalog of the Library, the proof of the inaccuracy of that catalog. Everything:

1 kommentti:

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

Sovereignty is a highly controversial concept in political science and social theories, offering a full array of issues to be analysed. In recent times, newly the thesis is under discussion that political concepts and international laws are not to be based on a static, absolute truth out there, but should rather be built up from a framework to which all its subjects – and probably only the ones subject to it – can agree

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Oma blogiluettelo

    https://www.facebook.com/valtioopinseniorit

    Blogiarkisto