The adverted notion of belief is supposed to be robust, in the sense that S believes
that only when all of S’s doxastic alternatives satisfy . There is, of course, amore
minimal sense of belief, according to which S believes that iff S accepts (where,
if is truth-apt, S accepts only when all of S’s doxastic alternatives satisfy ,
otherwise—say, if = murder is wrong—S accepts iff, e.g., S disapproves of
murder).4 If ∈ K, noncognitivism about K will demand rejecting schema (1) on
a robust understanding of belief, but will permit accepting it, on the more minimal
understanding.